This infographic shows what we are doing to help reduce processing times for spousal sponsorship.
This infographic shows what we are doing to help reduce processing times for spousal sponsorship.
Ottawa has vowed to cut the processing times and backlogs for spousal immigration applications by more than half with an expanded annual quota for 2017 and a new simplified application kit available next week.
Starting immediately, most spousal sponsorship applications submitted in and outside Canada will be processed within 12 months, down from the current average of 26 months and 18 months respectively, Immigration Minister John McCallum announced on Wednesday.
“We have listened to Canadians and are delivering results. Bringing families together makes for a stronger Canada. Canadians who marry someone from abroad shouldn’t have to wait for years to have them immigrate or be left with uncertainty in terms of their ability to stay,” McCallum told a news conference in Brampton.
“What we are announcing today is a more efficient, more considerate process to reunite families.”
Complaints by Canadians and their foreign spouses and dependants over long processing times and lengthy separations had fallen on deaf ears under the previous Conservative government.
Although the Liberals had made fixing the backlog a priority during the election campaign, the immigration department had been preoccupied with the ambitious project to resettle tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.
With an additional $25 million allotted to reduce the immigration backlog in it’s 2016 budget, the Immigration Department has managed to reduce the processing times of spousal sponsorship applications by 15 per cent for inland applicants and by more than 10 per cent for those waiting overseas.
The government also raised the annual quota for foreign spouses and dependants this year to 64,000 people from 47,000 in previous years. With limited spots and increasing demands, the backlogs persisted and grew over time.
Immigration officials said they hoped to clear all existing applications by the end of 2017 with the expanded quota, additional staffing resources and a streamlined process.
A new simplified application kit will be available December 15 for new applicants that cuts the current 14 application checklists down to four. All incomplete applications will be returned early in the process to prevent them from clogging the system, the government said.
McCallum said the streamlined processing was the brainchild of a special team of immigration staffers based on lessons learned through the Syrian refugee resettlement experience. The spousal sponsorship program is the first to be simplified and improved, he added.
“This is the single, biggest one we have focused on,” McCallum said. “It is something of a milestone. If there’s one most important campaign commitment on immigration, this is it.”
Although more complex applications will still take more than 12 months, 80 per cent of applications are expected to be processed on target. The department will also extend its pilot program, slated to end this month, for another year to issue open work permits to sponsored spouses within Canada while waiting for their permanent resident status.
Despite the streamlined process and the new time commitment, officials said full criminal, security and medical screening will continue to be in place.
McCallum said he did not expect a return of the backlog once it is cleared.
“We have changed the structure, the way this is done. There’s no way this is not going to be permanent,” he noted.
Canada is prepared to reinstate a visa requirement for Mexican travellers if the number of refugee claims jumps too high, says Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Minister John McCallum.
The visa lift is set to kick in Dec. 1. McCallum said the federal government was aware of a possible spike in asylum-seekers long before Donald Trump was elected president in the U.S.
“There would come a point where a visa could be reimposed,” he said but would not specify what number of claims might trigger that. “Canada retains its sovereignty on this issue. There comes a point where it would become unsustainable, but we are hoping that point will not arrive.”
CBC News has learned officials at IRCC and other departments have held high-level meetings to discuss a potential flood of Mexican asylum-seekers due to both the visa lift and the result of the U.S. election.
Benefit ‘outweighed’ risk
Trump campaigned on promises to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and to swiftly deport undocumented workers and illegal residents.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the plan to lift the visa requirement during a visit by Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto on June 28. During that meeting, Mexico announced it would fully reopen its market to Canadian beef in October.
A senior immigration official said Tuesday that a review was carried out in the run-up to that announcement and a number of risks were identified. But he declined to provide details or recommendations because it was “advice to the minister.”
Testifying to the immigration and citizenship committee by video from Mexico City, Olivier Jacques, IRCC’s area director for Latin America, acknowledged that more Mexicans could arrive from the U.S., and others directly from Mexico, due to changes.
Jacques said various criteria are reviewed to assess a country’s “readiness” for a visa lift. In Mexico’s case, those risks were measured against Canada’s “unique relationship” with the country, including geographic proximity and the close trade relationship within NAFTA.
“At this point, the assessment of the government is that the benefit related to a visa lift outweighed any identified risk we have with these migrants,” he said.
Trade, tourism boost
During the daily question period Tuesday, Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel pointed to that testimony and asked why the Liberals “blatantly” ignored the red flags in a rush to lift the visa requirement.
But McCallum said there are benefits associated with the visa lift, including increased trade and tourism.
“We are very happy to welcome more Mexican tourists to this country and to accept the jobs that go along with that.”
McCallum reiterated that Canada made the agreement with Mexico in June, before Trump’s presidential win.
“We went into partnership with the Mexican government to minimize those risks, so obviously we were aware of them from the beginning,” he said.
Under the previous Conservative government of Stephen Harper, Canada imposed the visa requirement due to a huge rise in refugee claims that were subsequently rejected for being invalid.
The number of Mexican claims referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board was climbing dramatically until it peaked at 9,511 in 2009. After the visa requirement was imposed, it dropped to 1,349, then continued to shrink to just 120 in 2015. Between January and June this year, there were only 60 cases, according to the most recent figures available.
he Express Entry immigration system will undergo important changes that will come into effect later this week on November 19, but that might not be the end of adjustments to be made to the system.
Earlier today, November 14, the department of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) issued a press release in which it outlined the changes to be made in the short term.
As CICNews reported last week, these changes include: the awarding of points for certain job offers made to workers in Canada who do not have a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA), additional points for candidates with a Canadian education, and an extension on the validity of Invitations to Apply (ITAs) for permanent residence. (To learn about these changes in more detail, see our previous article on the subject of imminent changes to the Express Entry Comprehensive Ranking System.)
Interestingly, IRCC’s press release also states that the reforms ‘are part of a number of improvements the Government is making on a continual basis to bring changes for a more fair and responsive immigration system that will address emerging needs and ensure long-term economic growth for the middle class.’
As a consequence, it may well be the case that the changes to be implemented on November 19 are the first in a series of possible changes that may be made over time. For example, the Liberal government has previously said that it would consider the awarding of points to candidates who have prior connections to Canada, such as having a sibling in Canada as a citizen or permanent resident.
At this time, IRCC has not brought in modifications with respect to awarding points having a sibling in Canada. However, that does not necessarily mean that such a change may not take place in the future. Today’s press release certainly leaves scope for such a change, or other changes, to be made in the future.
As the government’s statement demonstrates, Canada’s immigration system is constantly changing. In addition, it is not only the federal government that is in a position to make important changes — the provincial governments also do so through the Provincial Nominee Programs (PNPs).
Enhanced PNP categories that are aligned with the Express Entry system open and/or change on an ongoing basis, offering Express Entry candidates an opportunity to submit an application to a PNP and potentially be awarded 600 CRS points. Candidates should note that an enhanced nomination certificate is now the most important factor under the CRS, as a job offer is now worth either 200 or 50 points, depending on the position (to learn more about this change, click here).
The fact that stakeholders are now presented with a federal system (Express Entry) that is undergoing changes, as well as a range of PNP options that have also proven to change over time, highlights the importance for candidates to be proactive and engaged with the system at both the federal and provincial levels.
Speaking of the improvements to Express Entry that have been outlined, Canada’s Immigration Minister said that “We have committed to doing more to attract highly skilled immigrants to come to Canada and become permanent residents, because this is important to build our economy and strengthen our society. I am confident that the changes to Express Entry will be one of the many positive outcomes of the changes we will be bringing to our immigration system.”
With only a few days left until the changes that have been outlined are brought into force, it is important for candidates in the pool — as well as other individuals thinking of immigrating to Canada through Express Entry — to understand how this may benefit them and their profile,” says Attorney David Cohen.
“Candidates should also note that IRCC, as the department itself states, is in a position to make changes to the system on a continual basis. Therefore, candidates who stay up to date and maintain a fully updated Express Entry profile, as well as stay abreast of all PNP options, put themselves in the best possible position to immigrate to Canada successfully. On this basis, I would encourage anybody who is thinking of entering the Express Entry pool to do so as soon as possible.”
Since the changes to the Comprehensive Ranking System were announced last Thursday, November 10, many thousands of people around the world have successfully been able to gauge their CRS points total using the CRS Calculator, which has been updated to reflect the imminent changes to the system.
The federal government is preparing for a potential surge in Mexican migrants coming to Canada after Donald Trump’s election victory, CBC News has learned.
Sources confirm high level meetings took place this week with officials at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada and in other departments.
The news comes as Canada prepares to loosen rules for Mexicans to enter the country by lifting a visa requirement on Dec. 1. That restriction has been in place since 2009.
Talks on a plan to cope with a possible spike in asylum-seekers have been ongoing for some time, but were accelerated this week after Trump’s surprise win.
Trump campaigned on promises to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and to swiftly deport undocumented workers and illegal residents.
Toronto-based immigration lawyer Lorne Waldman expects an increase in refugee claims from Mexicans once the visa requirement is lifted. He also predicts a “significant impact” from Trump’s election.
“The government was very concerned about the potential for a large number of new claims coming from Mexico, and that’s why they hesitated for so long before announcing that they were going to remove the visa,” he said.
“And that announcement was made before anyone knew that Donald Trump, with his very different immigration policies from those of the current administration, won the election.”
But Waldman cautioned it’s too early to tell exactly how the situation may unfold, saying it will depend on whether Trump follows through on his campaign pledges.
When Trump first launched his presidential bid in June 2015, he took sharp aim at Mexico, suggesting the country was unleashing criminals in to the country.
“They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing their problems,” he said. “They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists and some I assume are good people, but I speak to border guards and they tell us what we are getting.”
In August last year, he released an eight-page policy paper on immigration that outlined plans to build a multi-billion-dollar wall along the Mexican border, but force Mexico to pay for it. He also vowed to detain and deport undocumented migrants and triple the number of U.S. immigration officers.
And just this September, he reiterated his hard-line commitment to remove illegal migrants en masse.
“There will be no amnesty,” Trump said at an Arizona rally. “Our message to the world will be this: You cannot obtain legal status or become a citizen of the United States by illegally entering our country.”
The possible Trump effect is on top of what some have flagged as a potential for immigration system abuse with the lifting of the visa requirement.
Conservative Immigration critic Michelle Rempel said the Stephen Harper government imposed the restriction in 2009 after ballooning numbers of bogus refugee claims from Mexico.
She accused the Liberals of making an “arbitrary” decision to lift the restriction without doing a formal study of the potential impact, or establishing new measures to prevent abuse.
“You don’t impose a visa on a nation that’s close to us in terms of trade unless there’s a serious, discernible problem. And there was,” she said.
If there is suddenly a dramatic rise in asylum claims, that will “give pause” for the American government and for Canadians, she said.
Once in Canada, refugee claimants are entitled to a suite of benefits, including health care, until a decision is rendered in their case.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the plan to lift the requirement during a visit by Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto on June 28. During that meeting, Mexico announced it would fully reopen its market to Canadian beef in October.
A senior official in the office of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Minister John McCallum confirmed the government is sticking with the Dec. 1 date to lift the visa.
“Our officials are working with Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) and Mexican officials to lay the groundwork for the visa lift, including measures to identify and deter irregular migration. And we’ll continue to monitor migration patterns post-lift,” the official said.
CBSA said a potential spike in migrants is speculative at this time.
“It is business as usual at our designated ports of entry, this includes processing any refugee claimants,” said spokeswoman Esme Bailey. “The CBSA processes over 90 million travellers a year and routinely monitors its operations to ensure proper resources.”
The number of Mexican claims referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board was climbing dramatically until it peaked at 9,511 in 2009. After the visa requirement was imposed, it dropped to 1,349, then continued to shrink to only 120 in 2015. Between January and June this year, there were only 60 cases, according to the most recent figures available.
Government officials had suggested the visa requirement could be reinstated if the number of asylum claims from Mexico reaches 3,500 in any given year. But a news release announcing the policy did not mention any conditions attached to the change.
Vancouver-based immigration lawyer Richard Kurland called that cap a “close the barn door after the horse has bolted” policy. He said the government should carefully track weekly intake and “flip the switch” if it exceeds, for example, 100 cases.
“It is foolish to know claims will exceed 3,500 in a year, and do nothing during the year,” he said. “We have the technology to be more nimble.”
The Express Entry draw on October 19 — the second draw in eight days — saw a record number of Invitations to Apply (ITAs)issued to candidates in Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada’s (IRCC) Express Entry pool. The previous record for the number of ITAs issued in a single draw was 1,637, on March 27, 2015. Moreover, this is only the second time in 2016 that two draws have happened within the space of a week.
Candidates who have a Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) score of 475 or more as of October 19 received an ITA. This represents a significant decrease in the points requirement, as it is the lowest minimum CRS score for any draw in the last six months.
IRCC conducts periodic draws for candidates in the Express Entry Pool, during which ITAs are issued to the highest-ranking candidates in the pool. After receiving an ITA, a candidate has 60 days to submit an application for permanent residence to the federal government. The government aims to process complete submitted applications within six months. Principal applicants may also include their accompanying spouse or common-law partner, and any dependent children, on their application.
The government of Canada has frequently voiced its intention to increase immigration levels and ease the pathway to permanent residence. The draws of September and October seem to have made these intentions manifest, as the last four draws have all seen an increase in the number of ITAs issued. So far in 2016, 23,092 ITAs have been issued to candidates in the Express Entry pool.
Express Entry Draws: 2016
|Draw #||Minimum CRS Score Required||Date of Draw||# of ITAs Issued|
|24||461||January 6, 2016||1,463|
|25||453||January 13, 2016||1,518|
|26||457||January 28, 2016||1,468|
|27||459||February 10, 2016||1,505|
|28||453||February 24, 2016||1,484|
|29||473||March 8, 2016||1,013|
|30||470||March 23, 2016||1,014|
|31||470||April 6, 2016||954|
|32||468||April 20, 2016||1,018|
|33||534||May 6, 2016||799|
|34||484||May 18, 2016||763|
|35||483||June 1, 2016||762|
|36||488||June 15, 2016||752|
|37||482||June 29, 2016||773|
|38||482||July 13, 2016||747|
|39||488||July 27, 2016||755|
|40||490||August 10, 2016||754|
|41||538||August 24, 2016||750|
|42||491||September 7, 2016||1,000|
|43||483||September 21, 2016||1,288|
|44||484||October 12, 2016||1,518|
|45||475||October 19, 2016||1,804|
|Draw #||Minimum CRS Score Required||Date of Draw||# of ITAs Issued|
|1||886||January 31, 2015||779|
|2||818||February 7, 2015||779|
|3||808||February 20, 2015||849|
|4||735||February 27, 2015||1,187|
|5||481||March 20, 2015||1,620|
|6||453||March 27, 2015||1,637|
|7||469||April 10, 2015||925|
|8||453||April 17, 2015||715|
|9||755||May 22, 2015||1,361|
|10||482||June 12, 2015||1,501|
|11||469||June 27, 2015||1,575|
|12||463||July 10, 2015||1,516|
|13||451||July 17, 2015||1,581|
|14||471||August 7, 2015||1,402|
|15||456||August 21, 2015||1,523|
|16||459||September 8, 2015||1,517|
|17||450||September 18, 2015||1,545|
|18||450||October 2, 2015||1,530|
|19||489||October 23, 2015||1,502|
|20||484||November 13, 2015||1,506|
|21||472||November 27, 2015||1,559|
|22||461||December 4, 2015||1,451|
|23||460||December 18, 2015||1,503|
A group of former international students whose applications for Post-Graduation Work Permits (PGWPs) were refused are now able to re-submit their applications. Canada’s Minister of Immigration, John McCallum, has established a public policy to reconsider applications for three-year open work permits from certain graduates.
A PGWP is a Canadian open work permit targeted towards international graduates from eligible programs at recognized institutions in Canada. The permit allows the holder to work for any employer anywhere in Canada, and may be issued for up to three years.
This new public policy means that international graduates who meet certain conditions may apply again for a three-year open work permit and restoration of Temporary Resident status, in addition to having the related fees waived. Foreign nationals may be eligible for consideration if:
Eligible foreign nationals may apply from within Canada or from outside Canada. The fees associated with restoration of temporary resident status, work permit application, and open work permit holder applications are waived — these fees together usually come to a total of $455 CAD. In addition, the public policy waives the requirement to apply for a restoration of status within 90 days of the expiration of status. Consequently, eligible graduates who are in Canada without status may still apply.
Applications under this public policy must be made by March 17, 2017. Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has committed to processing complete, eligible applications within 40 days.
n 2015, a group of students from Niagara College, Ontario, saw their applications for PGWPs refused because, according to the immigration officers examining the applications, the study programs were largely comprised of distance learning courses. While the immigration regulations state that a graduate is not eligible for a PGWP if he or she “participate[s] in a distance learning program either from abroad or from within Canada,” this condition is not explained further.
In December 2015, a judge ordered a judicial review of an application submitted by one of the affected graduates, which had been refused because five out of the six courses he took at Niagara College were deemed to be distance learning. However, as a student, the applicant had also taken courses at another college, and it appeared that the immigration officer had not taken these courses into consideration. The court ruled that all courses, including transferred credits, ought to be considered in the assessment of an applicant’s eligibility for a PGWP.
A group of these students filed a class-action lawsuit against Niagara College in the summer of 2015, alleging that the college misrepresented its general arts and science transfer program. They claim the college assured students that graduates from this program would be eligible for the PGWP, and that the college does not offer distance learning. However, numerous applications were denied on the grounds that distance learning courses were not considered eligible under the conditions of the PGWP regulations. No further developments in the lawsuit have been reported since the summer of 2015.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) announced last month that students who needed to complete a pathway or language program prior to continuing on to post-secondary study must now obtain separate study permits for each course.
Before this, students who were accepted to colleges and universities based on the condition that they first complete another course were issued a study permit for the duration of both courses, plus 90 days.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) will issue two different kinds of study permit for students. https://t.co/0M7Qq9Xo3Y
— Jennifer Roggemann (@roggemann) July 14, 2016
However, IRCC has said that it will no longer provide study permits for those with conditional offers, and will instead only issue a study permit for the duration of the first course.
A second permit for post-secondary study will then be allotted once the student has proven that they have fulfilled all prerequisites for further study.
According to the notice posted by the IRCC, there were concerns raised regarding the possibility of students abusing the system to find work in the country, as under the previous system, those who did not complete their prerequisite program would still be allowed to work under the study permit.
“Once the prerequisite program has been completed, the student can apply for a new study permit and demonstrate that the requirements of the first program have been met,” it said.
— The PIE News (@ThePIENews) August 25, 2016
IRCC explained that the changes were meant to make compliance reporting easier for institutions, adding that “students will not be negatively affected”.
Higher education providers still have their concerns, however, particularly involving delays and additional costs.
He said that a student taking a language course over the summer would have a short amount of time to secure a permit that would allow them to continue their studies, as the academic year starts in September.
Peralta estimated that tens of thousands of international students would be affected by the change.
“Are [IRCC] going to be able to handle processing and other 25-40,000 permit renewals per year?” he questioned.
— StudyTravel Magazine (@StudyTravelMag) August 24, 2016
The association was also worried that students and schools would have to bear extra costs as a result of needing to obtain a second study permit.
“There’s a cost attached to that which is passed onto the student for – we don’t believe – any valid reason, because it’s not going to actually provide any more integrity as far as we’re concerned,” argued Peralta.
Tina Bax, founder and president of CultureWorks, an English for Academic Purposes school, agreed with Peralta, saying: “Adding an additional regulatory hoop for students who want to go on as planned seems silly.
“We used to have that regulation 15 years ago in Canada. It seems as though we’re going backwards.”
— Languages Canada (@LangCanada) July 25, 2016
Bax added that there were other methods that the IRCC could employ in order to keep tabs on students without having them apply for two permits.
“Why not require schools to report students who don’t show up, or who leave the program, to IRCC? IRCC could then track whether the student re-enrolled somewhere else,” she suggested.
Image via Unsplash
Source : Study International Staff
Canada’s immigration minister John McCallum recently announced that the federal government is evaluating the merits of launching a new program to attract immigrant investors to the country.1
Entrepreneur and investor (“business”) immigration programs aim to stimulate economic growth by attracting investment capital, business savvy, and high-net-worth individuals (HNWI) to Canada.
On the one hand, these programs draw talent, investment capital, and spending power to Canada. Yet they have had only mixed success since Canada began to open its doors to business immigrants in 1978. In addition, the impact of such programs on housing affordability, the “sale” of Canadian citizenship, and the extent to which the programs benefit Canada’s economy and society have provoked public concerns.
These concerns raise a billion dollar question: Does Canada need dedicated business immigration programs? According to most Canadian governments, the answer appears to be yes. Today, such programs exist both federally and in 8 of 13 provinces and territories.
To what extent have business immigration programs benefitted Canada’s economy? The answer depends on one’s benchmark for success.
If the primary objective is to draw investment capital and spending to Canada, then the federal government’s Immigrant Investor Program (IIP), which was terminated in 2014, and the Quebec Immigrant Investor Program, which continues to operate, have been successful. Between 2007 and 2011, the two programs raised $6.42 billion in investment capital for the governments of Canada and Quebec.2 A 2010 study argued that the main economic benefit of the IIP was the purchasing power of immigrants, who spent significantly on homes, education, and goods and services in Canada.3
However, if the main aim is to attract individuals and investment capital that will lead to business and job creation, then much work lies ahead. Today, most of Canada’s programs set out to achieve this goal. To that end, Canada overhauled its business immigration programs in 2014, as government research found that business immigrants had only limited economic success in Canada, both in terms of their earnings and in running successful businesses.
The social value of the programs also merits examination. Canada seeks immigrants who will socially and culturally integrate into local communities and become engaged citizens. As such, Canada’s business immigration programs contain residency provisions which require foreign nationals to spend a certain length of time in the country to either qualify for or maintain their Canadian permanent resident status, or to become eligible for citizenship. This has created a persistent challenge, as residency requirements may conflict with the fact that entrepreneurs and investors are highly mobile and frequently travel around the world to tend to their business.
Luckily, Canada’s extensive experience in this space provides stakeholders with lessons that can be applied when designing the business immigration programs of tomorrow. For these programs to meet Canada’s economic and social objectives, the following considerations must be taken into account.
Canada must be cognizant of the global competition. In the 1980s, Canada was an international pioneer in business immigration, competing with only a handful of countries. The field is much more crowded today, with about 30 countries offering such programs. Canada must continue to keep an eye on the competition in peer nations, and remain malleable enough to glean lessons learned and adopt global best practices at home.
Policy experimentation continues to feature prominently in the programs designed in Canada and elsewhere. Canadian policy-makers often adjust programs to try to create the right incentive structures and conditions for immigrants to facilitate business and job creation in Canada. Program monitoring, refining, and a bit of patience will help achieve Canada’s business immigration goals.
Determining appropriate business immigration intake levels to support economic growth, preventing fraud, limiting burdensome application requirements, and processing applications quickly all remain pivotal to success. At its termination in 2014, the IIP had a backlog of 65,000 applications that would have taken six years to process.4 It is essential to balance these important and challenging responsibilities if Canada wants to remain globally competitive and attract the best and the brightest.
Social issues such as housing affordability and residency requirements require additional scrutiny. Public opinion matters; for these programs to succeed, the Canadian public must be sold on their economic and social benefits to the country. Increasing public awareness of the social benefits, such as the fact that business immigrants are a significant source of charitable contributions, may help ease concerns.
While achieving the aforementioned tasks may appear daunting, Canada’s overall success with immigration should give stakeholders confidence that the country is fully capable of creating successful business immigration programs that benefit Canadians.
In December 2016, the Conference Board is hosting Canada’s first-ever Entrepreneur & Investor Immigration Summit in Toronto.
The two-day summit will convene domestic and international stakeholders from many sectors to discuss the economic and social implications of business immigration programs, and how Canada’s federal, provincial, and territorial programs can be improved.
Your recommendations at the summit will inform a major Conference Board National Immigration Centre report on this topic to be released in early 2017.
Make sure to sign up now!
This October, the Conference Board hosts Minister John McCallum at a major meeting in Toronto to discuss the future of Canada’s immigration system.
In May 2017, we are hosting our third annual Canadian Immigration Summit in Ottawa, a major two-day event that attracts participants from across the country.
Please contact us if you wish to get involved!
By Wendy Martin, CBC News
A candidate for mayor in the Cape Breton Regional Municipality chose the picturesque but struggling community of Louisbourg, N.S., to unveil his plan for stemming the region’s population decline by increasing immigration.
The CBRM is shrinking by about 1,000 people annually.
Rankin MacSween told a group of supporters at the Louisbourg Fire Hall on Friday that it’s like losing a town the size of Louisbourg year after year.
“As a community, we are in a crisis,” said MacSween. “And don’t let anybody tell you otherwise.”
He pointed to the decision this spring by the Cape Breton Victoria Regional School Board to close 17 schools over the next few years because of declining student enrolments.
MacSween said that, if elected, he would allocate $1 million a year from the municipal budget to try to reverse the population decline, by attracting more immigrants.
He wants to copy Prince Edward Island’s lead in developing a settlement strategy.
“As we’re in decline, they’re growing,” MacSween told about 40 supporters at his announcement.
P.E.I. had the largest population growth in Atlantic Canada over the 10-year period beginning in 2005, up 6.0 per cent to 146,283 in 2014.
That’s due in large part to people moving to P.E.I. from other countries, notably China.
“What’s also notable is that the data points to the fact that those immigrants have done a marvelous job of creating economic opportunity as they’ve come,” MacSween said.
He said while there are a couple of provincially funded positions in the CBRM to welcome newcomers to the area, there’s no one working actively to attract immigrants.
He sees that as a “critical” priority and said it would be worth the municipal investment.
“I mean, my priority is not to hire political staff. My priority is not to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars around some vague concept around the port, to spend that money on legal fees, and studies and consultants,” MacSween said.
That’s a clear reference to the incumbent mayor, Cecil Clarke, who has made the development of Sydney’s port and the construction of a container terminal his top economic priority.
Jean Bagnell of Louisbourg says she welcomes any plan that might help reinvigorate the community.
“When I was a kid growing up, we had shipping here. The place was going and going, bus service and the trains, and all that went down the way,” said Bagnell.
Municipal and school board elections will be held across Nova Scotia on Oct. 15, 2016.